General

Can dogs have oranges

Can dogs have oranges

Can dogs have oranges? Yes, in the summer of 2019, the U.S. has oranges — but oranges have not been available in pet food since 2006.

“For the past 20 years or so, we’ve had a very, very tight ban on the orange,” said Dr. Robin Teater, veterinarian and the CEO of the American Pet Products Association.

The APPA, an industry trade group representing the pet food and animal health industries, has filed a notice with the Food and Drug Administration about plans to begin marketing certain products with orange or citrus peels in the first half of 2019.

The association said it will continue to consult with FDA throughout this process, and noted that it had begun a similar process in 2016, when it began requesting the agency permit manufacturers to market pet foods containing dried citrus peels.

There is no ban on fruit in pet foods, according to the APPA, which said that many pet food products now on the market contain some form of fruit.

The association said it intends to market its products under the pet food banner, and that some of its products may contain citrus peel.

“Because citrus peels are the outermost part of the orange, any pet food containing these peels is not the food the pet should be eating,” Teater said. “Pet food manufacturers do not produce, nor are they responsible for, what pet owners feed their pets.”

The APPA’s notice with the FDA states that its intent is to market pet foods that include dried citrus peels “that are not a ‘food’ but are an ‘ingredient’ — something added to a pet food to enrich it, for example, to add more fiber or protein.”

As well as containing natural elements like enzymes and antioxidants, dried citrus peels are also rich in vitamin C. As a result, many pet foods already contain dried citrus peel and do not need to be specially identified.

However, Teater said the association was concerned about “the prevalence of dried citrus peels in some canned foods and pet foods, which may lead to a false assumption that a food that contains this ingredient is healthy for dogs.”

The association said that its product line “is not intended to replace proper diets, and, at the same time, should not be used as an excuse to feed a pet a food that is nutritionally inferior to what the pet is supposed to be eating.”

The FDA said that the association’s claim was “misleading” because its products can only be marketed in a category of dried or dehydrated citrus peels.

However, the FDA said it cannot remove all dried citrus peels from the category of “pet food” since some foods made specifically for dogs could contain dried citrus peels.

The association also did not specifically mention dried citrus peels, saying it only meant that “naturally derived ingredients” such as “naturally occurring enzymes” were added to foods.

The FDA said that the claim was not “scientifically substantiated” because there is not enough evidence in the association’s own scientific study to support the claim.

Furthermore, the association’s study does not include any specific information on the types of enzymes and antioxidants present in its products.

The association was criticized on social media by consumers who accused the organization of misleading pet owners.

However, Teater said that the association was open to further clarifications and explanations to address those concerns.

The association also plans to re-launch its product line with a specific list of ingredients on its website.

“We understand that we have done a poor job of communicating this point and now we are planning to improve the messaging on the website and labels,” Teater said.

The association represents hundreds of companies that develop, manufacture and sell more than 1,700 foods for dogs and cats.

Although most of the members of the association only make food and nutritional supplements, about a third of them sell pet foods made with meat by-products.

The National Nutritional Foods Association, which represents pet food makers, did not comment on the association’s claims.

Last year, the association came under fire for its pet food recalls because of its lack of oversight and coordination with U.S. and Canadian authorities.

Some pet owners said that the association is just an organization run by pet food producers, who have enough clout to have their message communicated effectively.

“This is an organization that is only about money and profits. I am just disgusted that my government is spending millions of dollars to fund this kind of association when so many people in the food industry are suffering from its greed,” said PetMD veterinary surgeon Dr. Christopher Gindlesperger.

“To help them, we are all better off with a strong regulator who does not allow such a wasteful practice to continue.”

Meanwhile, Canadian pet food producer NutraCo Canada recently issued a voluntary recall for some of its cat products over possible salmonella contamination.